-
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- March 2024
- October 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- April 2021
- June 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- September 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- September 2007
- July 2007
- January 2007
- January 2004
- September 2003
-
- Bibliography By Type (20)
- Editorial Commentaries (51)
- Freedom Series (2)
- News (21)
- Personal Commentaries (13)
- Radio Commentaries (234)
- Video Commentaries (6)
Monthly Archives: January 2020
Fairness for All is a failed strategy to protect religious freedom
The contention between religious freedom and gay rights is and always has been binary. The “Utah Compromise” of 2015 was a mirage and its illusory light distantly refracting for dull visionaries now gives hope to an identical federal proposal by U.S. Rep. Chris Stewart. But it too will disappoint.
Here is why: Can you imagine Martin Luther King Jr. settling for a “Southern Compromise” wherein blacks gain all civil rights except among certain segments of society? Regarding the Utah Compromise, if everyone is being honest, the LGBT community got hoodwinked for a hug at the state Capitol — a disappointing accomplishment as viewed by astute national LGBT advocates who well understood the problems of legalized discrimination.
Posted in Bibliography By Type, Editorial Commentaries
Comments Off on Fairness for All is a failed strategy to protect religious freedom